A former Indiana teacher, Britney Foronberry, is facing a staggering 29 felony charges for alleged sexual misconduct involving minors, with new details emerging after a recent court hearing. The charges come as five additional victims have come forward with harrowing accounts of abuse, leading to the escalation of the case against the 31-year-old educator.
Foronberry, who worked as a substitute teacher in Morgan County, is accused of molesting ten boys, some as young as 13, while they were her students. Allegations against her include drugging the minors with substances like mushrooms and alcohol, paying them for explicit photos, and coercing them into group sex sessions where they were allegedly required to wear masks inspired by the horror film “Scream.” Disturbingly, it is also reported that she threatened to harm herself if the victims disclosed the abuse, urging them to “just let it happen.”
In court, Foronberry entered a not-guilty plea and waived the formal reading of the new charges. A bond was set at $150,000 with additional cash requirements. The prosecution intends to refile the charges as level one felonies, which are categorized as more severe under Indiana law. If convicted, Foronberry could face substantial prison time, with some charges carrying a potential sentence of 20 to 40 years.
The allegations against Foronberry were first made public in November 2024, but the case gained further attention after new victims came forward, prompting the addition of 24 felony counts. These include multiple counts of child molestation and sexual misconduct with minors, as well as charges related to disseminating harmful materials to minors. The sheer volume of charges underscores the disturbing nature of the claims.
The Metropolitan School District of Martinsville is also under scrutiny, as a tort claim has been filed against it for allegedly failing to protect students from Foronberry’s behavior. The claim suggests that the district ignored red flags regarding her conduct and delayed reporting the abuse to authorities. The school district has refuted these claims, stating that it conducted all necessary background checks and remains committed to ensuring a safe learning environment.
Complicating the situation further is Foronberry’s husband, Nicholas, who faces charges of intimidation and failure to report a crime. He is accused of threatening one of the minors involved in the case. Testimonies suggest that he may have had knowledge of the abuse, raising questions about his involvement and potential complicity. Nicholas has since filed for divorce from Foronberry, but the implications of their relationship during the investigation remain uncertain.
As the case unfolds, legal experts note that the prosecution will likely focus on the strongest evidence available, which may include digital communications between Foronberry and the alleged victims. The presence of this evidence could play a crucial role in the case, as it provides a tangible link to the accusations.
Foronberry’s case reflects a broader issue of accountability within educational institutions, as parents and the community grapple with the reality of such profound breaches of trust. The investigation into her conduct began after students reported inappropriate interactions with her over social media platforms, leading to the eventual charges.
The upcoming legal proceedings promise to be complex, both for the prosecution and the defense, as they navigate the delicate nature of the allegations and the ages of the victims involved. As the community seeks justice for the alleged victims, the case serves as a stark reminder of the responsibilities held by educators and the severe consequences of failing to uphold them.