In a dramatic escalation of tensions in Los Angeles, President Trump has ordered the deployment of National Guardsmen to the city, igniting a fierce legal and political debate over the use of military force in domestic affairs. Legal expert Jessica Levinson weighed in on the ramifications of this unprecedented move, emphasizing the critical distinction between the authority granted under Title X and the more severe Insurrection Act.

Levinson explained that the current deployment, aimed at supporting federal law enforcement agencies like ICE, is contingent on Title X, which allows for a supporting role rather than active law enforcement. However, should the President choose to invoke the Insurrection Act, it would mark a significant escalation, allowing military personnel to operate against the explicit wishes of local leaders—an unprecedented move in recent history.

Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed strong opposition to the National Guard’s presence, raising the stakes in a potential legal confrontation between state and federal authorities. Levinson stated that while states are sovereign entities, the President possesses broad powers during emergencies, complicating the fight against federal intervention.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also indicated that active-duty Marines are on high alert, signaling a potential further escalation if violence continues. This situation is not routine; it represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle over civil unrest and the federal response to it.

As tensions mount and the clock ticks down, the nation watches intently. Will the National Guard’s deployment lead to a peaceful resolution or escalate into a confrontation with local authorities? The next few hours could prove critical as the legal and political landscape shifts dramatically in Los Angeles.