In a stunning revelation that could shake the foundations of American governance, Mark Levin, host of “Life, Liberty & Levin,” has raised urgent constitutional questions about the Federal Reserve’s legitimacy. During a recent broadcast, Levin argued that the Federal Reserve, established in 1913, operates outside the bounds of the U.S. Constitution, claiming it undermines Congress’s exclusive authority to coin money and regulate its value.

Levin’s discourse, featuring insights from Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts and Senator Tom Cotton, highlights a critical moment in American history where the balance of power appears to have shifted dangerously. He pointed out that the Federal Reserve’s structure allows private banks to wield immense influence over national monetary policy without direct accountability to the electorate or the President. Levin emphasized that the President has no power to appoint or remove key figures within the Federal Reserve, raising serious concerns about democratic oversight.

He drew parallels to historical debates between founding fathers like Hamilton and Jefferson, underscoring the ongoing conflict over implied versus expressed powers in the Constitution. Levin’s assertion that we live in a “post-constitutional America” resonates as he calls for a reevaluation of the Federal Reserve’s role, citing its failures during economic crises and questioning its constitutional grounding.

As the U.S. faces mounting economic challenges, Levin’s urgent call for scrutiny of the Federal Reserve could ignite a nationwide debate about the intersection of financial power and constitutional authority. This is a pivotal moment that demands immediate attention from lawmakers and citizens alike, as the implications for the economy and governance are profound and potentially far-reaching. The question remains: will America confront the constitutional crisis lurking within its own monetary system?